Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Temur Otters | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Temur Otters | justalice | 5-2 | None |
Temur Otters | jaeryc eastman | 2-1 | None |
Temur Otters | justalice | 3-3 | None |
Boros Forge , Boros Hare , Izzet Control , Jeskai Convoke , Mono White Tokens , Temur Otters , Temur Prowess , Unclassified , Unknown Archetype
Song of Totentanz ranks #82 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 20%).
Red average: 67.0%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Song of Totentanz is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Performance Efficiency: 54.86 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Song of Totentanz has a win rate of 68.6%, making it 7.5% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Roxanne, Starfall Savant | Legendary Creature — Cat Druid | 6 | 92.9% | 5 |
Hidetsugu's Second Rite | Instant | 7 | 67.8% | 2 |
Invasion of Tarkir | Battle — Siege | 23 | 66.8% | 5 |
Reclamation Sage | Creature — Elf Shaman | 11 | 66.6% | 4 |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 8 | 64.7% | 2 |
Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 8 | 60.4% | 2 |
Loot, the Pathfinder | Legendary Creature — Beast Noble | 15 | 57.4% | 5 |
Gleeful Demolition | Sorcery | 5 | 56.6% | 0 |
Novice Inspector | Creature — Human Detective | 5 | 56.6% | 0 |
Knight-Errant of Eos | Creature — Human Knight | 5 | 56.6% | 0 |
Cards that perform better with Song of Totentanz than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 68.6% | 69.6% | -1.0% |
This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 5 | 68.6% | 70.1% | -1.5% |
Thundertrap Trainer | Creature — Otter Wizard | 2 | 5 | 68.6% | 70.4% | -1.8% |
Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 5 | 69.4% | 71.4% | -2.0% |
Valley Floodcaller | Creature — Otter Wizard | 3 | 5 | 68.6% | 70.6% | -2.1% |
Enduring Vitality | Enchantment Creature — Elk Glimmer | 3 | 5 | 68.6% | 70.6% | -2.1% |
Bushwhack | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 68.6% | 71.2% | -2.7% |
Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 1 | 5 | 68.6% | 71.4% | -2.8% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Temur Otters | 331 | 98.5% | 42.5% |
Jeskai Convoke | 5 | 0.9% | 56.6% |
Boros Forge | 2 | 5.7% | 0.0% |
Unclassified | 2 | 1.0% | 20.0% |
Mono White Tokens | 2 | 0.3% | 0.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.